|
Post by Nauren on May 24, 2010 10:26:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by plague on Jun 9, 2010 16:05:29 GMT -5
Meh, Killzone 2 sucked hard imo, not even going to look at this. Any shooter that makes you shoot another toon in the head 3 times to kill him sucks in my book. I'm going to go for the new SOCOM coming out later this year, made by the original SOCOM makers, Zipper.
(If xiv is not out by then of course)
|
|
|
Post by Nauren on Jun 10, 2010 7:41:15 GMT -5
You remember Zipper made MAG...which was meh. Not only that...but they went on record that they want to change the direction of SOCOM to allow other gamers to enjoy it. Read that as dumb it down and make it easier.
And MANY shooters offer more then 1 head shot to kill.
Killzone 2 multiplayer was amazing...the single player was ok.
I'm looking forward to this one again to see if they fixed some of my issues with the first one.
|
|
|
Post by plague on Jun 11, 2010 22:18:13 GMT -5
Agreed, Mag sucked too. The only online shooters I've played and enjoyed was the SOCOM series(Even though the last one sucked I still played it for about a year and a half). What I love about socom is that it's a team based shooter, and you have to communicate to succeed in it. You run around solo like a nut, you die. The no re-spawn made it intense as hell too.
And I finally started playing MW2 online after I gave up on SOCOM, (my second online CoD, the first was MW1, I just can't stand all the cheaters on CoD, but that's mostly any online shooter). That lasted about 6 months.
But I guess I'll still take a look at the new SOCOM. Lets see what they do as far as making it "easier" for people or w/e.
As far as Killzone, I still will have my opinion and say it sucked. The only thing that was nice imo were the graphics.
|
|