Post by asadul1717 on Feb 11, 2024 4:27:44 GMT -5
As is already known to everyone, since the declaration of the first state of alarm due to the coronavirus crisis, special protection measures were issued to tenants who were in a particularly vulnerable situation. These measures translated into moratoriums and reductions in rent payments; extensions of the term of lease contracts; and suspension of evictions due to non-payment of rent. However, with the state of alarm and the pandemic crisis fortunately over, one of these measures has continued to be extended and, apparently, is here to stay given the persistence of the negative effects on the economic situation of the most vulnerable sectors. Thus, a Royal Decree-Law has just been approved which extends until September 30, 2022 the suspension of evictions and releases (judicial forced evictions), as well as the possibility of requesting, until October 31 of 2022 , compensation by landlords or owners affected by such suspension.
Of course, this time at least the duration of the lease contracts is NO longer extended for six more months, nor is the request for moratoriums or reductions in rent payments permitted. It is very debatable, after almost two years, to continue with this measure and continue to impact the suspension of evictions directly on the landlord owners due to the lack of collection of Bahrain Email List the expected rents, even more so when the compensatory economic measures established in favor of the landlord to alleviate These effects have a slow and cumbersome processing. At this point, it seems more logical that public administrations would be the ones to really take on this problem with other types of social media. 2ยบ) THE DECLARATION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE ARTICLES OF THE CATALAN LAW THAT LIMITS RENT RENTS IN STRESSED AREAS.
Last Thursday, March 10, the Constitutional Court issued a ruling declaring several articles of Law 11/2020, on income containment in Catalonia, null and unconstitutional, including the limit on the rental price. Can this declaration of unconstitutionality serve as a precedent for the future state housing law that is in parliamentary process and that also includes measures to limit rental income in stressed areas? In principle the answer should be negative and the ruling of the Constitutional Court should not affect the processing of the state law because it is based on the fact that Catalan law invades state powers. It does not analyze other arguments that could be attributed to any official system that imposes caps on rents from lease contracts, such as, for example, whether they may be contrary to the principle of freedom of agreements or the right to private property protected by the Constitution. Consequently, the possible violation of these principles must be the subject of a new unconstitutionality appeal against the state law, when it is finally approved.
Of course, this time at least the duration of the lease contracts is NO longer extended for six more months, nor is the request for moratoriums or reductions in rent payments permitted. It is very debatable, after almost two years, to continue with this measure and continue to impact the suspension of evictions directly on the landlord owners due to the lack of collection of Bahrain Email List the expected rents, even more so when the compensatory economic measures established in favor of the landlord to alleviate These effects have a slow and cumbersome processing. At this point, it seems more logical that public administrations would be the ones to really take on this problem with other types of social media. 2ยบ) THE DECLARATION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE ARTICLES OF THE CATALAN LAW THAT LIMITS RENT RENTS IN STRESSED AREAS.
Last Thursday, March 10, the Constitutional Court issued a ruling declaring several articles of Law 11/2020, on income containment in Catalonia, null and unconstitutional, including the limit on the rental price. Can this declaration of unconstitutionality serve as a precedent for the future state housing law that is in parliamentary process and that also includes measures to limit rental income in stressed areas? In principle the answer should be negative and the ruling of the Constitutional Court should not affect the processing of the state law because it is based on the fact that Catalan law invades state powers. It does not analyze other arguments that could be attributed to any official system that imposes caps on rents from lease contracts, such as, for example, whether they may be contrary to the principle of freedom of agreements or the right to private property protected by the Constitution. Consequently, the possible violation of these principles must be the subject of a new unconstitutionality appeal against the state law, when it is finally approved.