Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 3:35:47 GMT -5
It is true that women are more likely to suffer serious injuries in car accidents, but not precisely because of their gender but because of sexism in automotive design; While men are more likely to cause crashes, women are more likely to die in them. In July 2019, Hana was hit head-on by a passenger truck that was trying to pass in a prohibited zone. The entire family was seriously injured, but especially the passengers, whose spines were fractured and their intestines torn. On the other side of the world and five months to the day, a distracted driver jumped lanes and crashed into Maria Kuhn's car. In that accident too, the other women in the car and Maria suffered a ruptured intestine and broken bones, while the men walked away largely unscathed. When Hana met a year after the incident, united by their search for answers; 400,000 women had been seriously injured by motor vehicles; The brotherhood of car accident victims reaches further than we think.
Mothers and daughters are bonded not by stories and laughter, but by brain trauma, permanent scars, and moments of horror sealed in memory. Sexism in automotive design In 2019, 10,420 women died from car accidents and more than 1 million suffered injuries. While men are more likely to cause crashes, women are more likely to die in them . None of this is surprising to automakers or the government agency responsible for auto safety standards, both of which have known about these statistics for decades. Government negligence, long recognized, bears responsibility, while women and their families bear the consequences. Study USA Phone Number reveals patterns the nation's safety rating agency, undergoes four tests . Intended to mimic the impact of frontal, rollover, side and side post crashes, these tests represent the standard to which automakers design their cars. Although women are 72% more likely to be injured and 17% more likely to die in a car accident than men, the frontal crash test required by the agency is only performed on a male driver. There is no mandatory test that simulates a driver.
For tests with women in the passenger seat, the mannequin used to represent women is simply a reduced man: 4'11", 108 pounds, and lacks any kind of internal morphology that distinguishes between the sexes. Sexism in automotive design does not consider the varying bone densities, muscle structures, and abdominal and thoracic physiologies that differentiate women from a male mannequin. For example, the average woman's neck musculature contains much less spinal strength and muscle mass than a man's, making women 22.1% more likely to suffer a head injury than men. men. Current automotive design sexism standards are designed to prevent men's heads from crashing into the dashboard and do so quite effectively, reducing 70% of whiplashes in men. For women, however, the seat belts and air bags that protect men can cause additional injuries.
Mothers and daughters are bonded not by stories and laughter, but by brain trauma, permanent scars, and moments of horror sealed in memory. Sexism in automotive design In 2019, 10,420 women died from car accidents and more than 1 million suffered injuries. While men are more likely to cause crashes, women are more likely to die in them . None of this is surprising to automakers or the government agency responsible for auto safety standards, both of which have known about these statistics for decades. Government negligence, long recognized, bears responsibility, while women and their families bear the consequences. Study USA Phone Number reveals patterns the nation's safety rating agency, undergoes four tests . Intended to mimic the impact of frontal, rollover, side and side post crashes, these tests represent the standard to which automakers design their cars. Although women are 72% more likely to be injured and 17% more likely to die in a car accident than men, the frontal crash test required by the agency is only performed on a male driver. There is no mandatory test that simulates a driver.
For tests with women in the passenger seat, the mannequin used to represent women is simply a reduced man: 4'11", 108 pounds, and lacks any kind of internal morphology that distinguishes between the sexes. Sexism in automotive design does not consider the varying bone densities, muscle structures, and abdominal and thoracic physiologies that differentiate women from a male mannequin. For example, the average woman's neck musculature contains much less spinal strength and muscle mass than a man's, making women 22.1% more likely to suffer a head injury than men. men. Current automotive design sexism standards are designed to prevent men's heads from crashing into the dashboard and do so quite effectively, reducing 70% of whiplashes in men. For women, however, the seat belts and air bags that protect men can cause additional injuries.
